User talk:Xbsv

From Real Life Villains Wiki


Go to the Infobox and turn the lowercase i in "image" into a capital I. Also, you may need to upload a new image entirely since most of the saved images from the original wikia didn't migrate over here with the rest. I've been trying to upload new images for all of the old articles from the original wikia. If you want to help me with that, feel free to do so. - Rangerkid51

George Zimmerman

I really don't want to get into a huge fight about George Zimmerman, and while you do have a point to a certain extent, the fact of the matter is it goes both ways. It hasn't been confirmed or denied that his killing of Trayvon Martin was either in self-defence or intentional. But if Casey Anthony is gonna have an article (as she should) then so should Zimmerman.

Also, FYI, this isn't coming from a political place. I'm not overly political at all, I'm just trying to be logical. - Rangerkid51

I see where you're coming from here, but it was basically proved that he acted in self-defence. Multiple witnesses came forward and said so, and the injuries he suffered were consistent with the alleged assault by Martin. Xbsv (talk) 10:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

This might not be related to RLV, but I need some help on I have been monitoring its progress for a while and not much has happened there. The wiki is pretty much abandoned and outdated and no one is trying to help can you help add images to the BLACKSWAN gallery? There are new photos from their instagram. I asked you and not Mariathemermaid since the wiki needs more users. --Thethinkerkoala (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

You changed Robert Mugabe

I try to keep up to date information that is about facts as I have updated Robert Mugabe and you have reverted Robert Mugabe please revert ur edit Waly the NAKAJURAHAH (Bot mons) 22:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Do not report you to ur dad

You are a very whiny person that is too reporting so don't report me or your account will keep getting statuses Waly the NAKAJURAHAH 2 bons mots 22:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


This user has edited serial articles - including Robert Mugabe, Antifa, and Benjamin Netanyahu - that have screwed up the article, causing it to show differently and for the Infoboxes to show something about Mao Zedong in the background. I have no idea how to fix this. If you can revert the articles back to the way they were, I'd appreciate it. - Rangerkid51

Have you tried pressing the undo button? Xbsv (talk) 15:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Never mind, I see it's fixed now.

You should know this

The reason why I removed Zoe Quinn from the List of Disallowed pages is because she made a man named Alec commit suicide, plus there is no evidence about Alec being a rapist, also, Zoe is notorious for creating lies about the Gamergate movement, she is not a good person read this for more information. MaxEvo (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

I knew exactly what you meant, and while there is no evidence that the claim was true, there's no evidence it was false either. We should be completely fair and assume that we will never know the truth, so it's pointless to make a judgement either way. Xbsv (talk) 19:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

  • But still, Zoe Quinn is not as bad as many other persons that have articles on this wiki but she is NOT a good person either, that's why she should be not mentioned on the list of disallowed pages as she spreaded lies about Gamergate (and she is one of the reasons why the Gamergate movement is hated for wrong reasons).

MaxEvo (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

How can the Gamergate movement be hated for the wrong reasons? It consisted mostly of people sending threats and harassment to people they didn't like. Anyway, it's not enough that they're not a good person, they must meet the Specifications for Warranting a Page to count. Xbsv (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

  • The gamergate movement does not actually harass women, those are just lies invented by leftists like Zoe Quinn, please do not sugarcoat her, here is the truth about Gamergate.

Plus, the Gamergate is against corrupt video game websites and are against corruption in gaming, even if some Gamergate supporters are reatrded. Note: I am apolitical aside from hating people like Donald Trump and Nicolas Maduro, there is nothing about being a leftist as long you don't take it too seriously. MaxEvo (talk) 22:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

The source you have provided to prove #GamerGate is good is one of the most biased things I have ever read. I'm not gonna take it seriously when it was written specifically to shield #GamerGate from all criticism and counts getting journalists fired or shamed as a success. And on that note, every success on that list is based on subjective opinions. For example, the part about "keeping an eye out for corruption and Social Justice Warriors" is completely subjective, considering that their idea of "corruption" is "says mean things about us". Would you like to hear some actual facts about GamerGate? Leigh Alexander, who is actually name-dropped in your article, wrote a column in which she criticised Gamergate. The movement responded by boycotting Intel until they pulled their ads from her site. Incidentally, this is what people who were supporters of Gamergate accuse SJWs of doing, and yet your article counts it as a success. Alexander also received threats online. Here is the real truth about Gamergate. Anyway, this is completely irrelevant. Zoe Quinn is not a villain, she has done nothing evil. Xbsv (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)7

No, that wiki is not biased, they actually criticize bad developers who can't take criticism and corrupt video game websites, how they are corrupt? they sometimes critcize things for absurd reasons and sometimes give games which had bad reception from players (such as The Last of Us Part II, for example) good scores or make poor research or even accuse things of being "sexist" like extreme feminists do, not only people from that wiki have complained about it, even people from other websites such as some of my friends have complained about it.

Also, some GamerGate supporters are women and/or blacks (this is not a lie), they oppose corrupt game journalism, don't be ignorant.

SJWs are a problem because they often attack people when they disagree with their views, get easily offended for harmless things and accussing them of being "Sexist" and "Racist", plus, they also try to shove their ideologies into TV Shows, Films and Video games (Such as the 2016 Ghostbusters movie, for example, which was poorly recieved), they sometimes make false sexual harrassment allegations (such as the allegations against Morgan Freeman, which turned out to be false), accuse people who criticize them of harrasment (while some people who criticize them actually harrass them, not all of them harrass them and I actually opposse harrassment, plus the Qualitiypedias actually condemn harrassment, they also tell their users to NOT harrass people), and also riot (like the George Floyd protests) or even support criminal groups like Antifa (I think facism is bad, but they go too far).

Sorry for this, but the reason why I do not belive in Quinn's allegations of sexual abuse is because most of the MeToo's claims turned out to be false, just search about them on internet.

MaxEvo (talk) 09:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

TheAlitaFan Looking at his sandbox, I can say that this user is an extreme conservative and a religious nut-job as he is very biased towards the Left-Wing (I'm not a supporter of the Right-Wing nor the Left-Wing despite that I hate Donald Trump, both sides have their flaws anyways) , his sandboxes should be never imported since they have a lot of Right-Wing and religious bias which can give this wiki a bad reputation and make it look like Conservapedia, plus, he also supports homophobia (just look at his user page) which is very sick because there have been a lot of hate crimes against LGBTQ+ people (in fact there have been countries where homosexuality was illegal, and it is still illegal in some countries), but at least he does have some standards as he has criticized Fred Phelps' actions. MaxEvo (talk) 01:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

How is this my problem? I am in no way defending homophobia, but I don't see that this is anything to do with me. I'm pretty sure it's against the rules to edit other user's sandboxes, and I can't make him change it, can I? Xbsv (talk) 15:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

I am entitled to what I support. I'm an extremely Conservative Republican, and i am Roman Catholic. I do not support the left wing in anyway, as they have committed or supported actions that are in opposition to my church. --TheAlitaFan (talk) 18:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

I do not know what I can say now, I don't want to be toxic towards TheAlitaFan, but he ignores the bad things that Donald Trump has done, such as the Family Separation Act, not allowing Transgender people to enter the Millitary, being racist and xenophobic, wanting to ban all muslims from entering the United States, claiming that vaccines can cause autism which is not true, doing racist things (even before his presidency) and much more stupid things. in fact he made the United States of America more chaotic, I have good reasons to hate Trump and he should be not a president again.

I don't think that we should change TheAlitaFan's political views, I do not defend nor oppose abortion, but he sees the Democratic party and people like Joe Biden and other leftists like if they were the second coming of Adolf Hitler, I do not support them, but his sandbox looks like something taken from Consevapedia, the Right Wing also has its dark side. MaxEvo (talk) 20:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Joe Biden and basically most of the Democratic Party-registered Catholics are supposedly "Catholic" when in this case, they are violating Canon 915 of the 1983 code of Canon Law, and yet, they still receive Communion when they support Abortion, a mortal sin. Roe V. Wade and Planned Parenthood are abominations that must be eliminated. I can ask you this. Would George Washington and the founding fathers of America support the act of Abortion? Here's the answer: No. They would be disgusted. Abortion violates one of the unalienable rights: LIFE. Life begins at conception. I have never used Conservapedia, it is me expressing my views. Joe Biden and the Democratic Party-registered Catholics supporting must be excommunicated. Also, I'm on the spectrum, and I believe that the flu shot I got when I was young caused me to be that way.

Trump has done good things. He had to build the wall. Why? Illegal Immigration. Those people were simply NOT going to do the Legal Immigration process. Look at the border now. Under Biden, he has caused a terrible border crisis. That should amount to Impeachment, as well as his disastrous withdrawal of all troops from Afghanistan. Trump would have managed the withdrawal BETTER. But then again, the Democrats won't STAND up and impeach Biden and Harris, nor vacate the Speaker of the House position. Do I support the late George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush? NO. I don't support any of their ACTIONS. If Trump is not to become President again in 2024, we need someone that actually is CATHOLIC and cares about this country. I love this country, I really do. I am just TIRED of the abomination known as The Democratic Party. I have a right to my political views and opinions. --TheAlitaFan (talk) 22:29, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

If I may step in on this particular issue - I will say that TheAlitaFan DOES have every right to express his views. As long as he doesn't use them to actively harm other users on this site, which I don't think he has. I don't agree with his views either (and I say that as someone who isn't political at all. All politicians suck as far as I'm concerned. I also disliked Trump long before he got involved in politics), but he has every right to voice them. Rangerkid51 (talk) 02:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
As I said before, I don't want to change TheAlitaFan's political opinions, it is okay to express them, but his sandboxes should be never imported since they would like cause drama and could make this wiki look bad, I am aware of Donald Trump's good actions, but he is still way too flawed to be a president again, I do not support the democratic party nor the republican party since both the left wing and the right wing have their flaws.

As I mentioned before, I do NOT support abortion nor oppose it, being against it is fine, expressing your political views is okay, even if your sandboxes are biased, but I will not edit it anymore. MaxEvo (talk) 02:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC) Please stop using my message wall for political debate. Xbsv (talk) 12:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Controversial additions

Should we add people like Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson on this wiki? There’s not even a single mention of them here. I think they should be added because they promote xenophobia, islamophobia, torturing parents of various gun violence with conspiracy theories (in Alex’s cases), and promotion of the great replacement theory. I’m not doing it out of political bias, but rather because these traits related to them have become more apparent over the years, even being associated with these people, which is what made them infamous. IAMGOD (talk) 15:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Quick message

Sorry if I'm bothering you, but I was wondering if we should add the following people to this wiki:

  • Matt Gaetz
  • Ben Garrison
  • Tucker Carlson
  • Whaling
  • Holocene Extinction/6th Extinction

IAMGOD (talk) 13:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Talk to this admin about it. Xbsv (talk) 13:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

I will, thanks. IAMGOD (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Elmira Grubić

Can you please restore her? She was tricking her patients and illegally earning money. Here's the proof:

I'm not an admin. Xbsv (talk) 07:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

why is my page deleted.

why is my page deleted. just curious.

Which one was yours? Xbsv (talk) 21:32, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

The villains are supposed to be mentioned in the media to qualify. Xbsv (talk) 10:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

how should I make my article spice up in order to be put in onto the page and also how should I make my page more informative article?


There's something else that needs to be brought up - he also admitted that he made sockpuppets while he was banned under his original account. I don't want to ban him again because I don't want to seem like a tyrannical douchebag, but still, rules are rules. Any advice on how I should proceed? Rangerkid51 (talk) 20:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

There's no need to punish him over the sockpuppets as he's no longer banned anyway. Probably just give him a warning about the misandry thing. Xbsv (talk) 20:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

That won't be necessary gentlemen, I investigate and apparently there is no evidence that she was misandrist. I won't do it again.

For the pages of Logan Pasterfield and Michael Ciganek, both had them had told me that they had wanted pages on them and told me all the "terrible" things they did, also I am friends with both of them.

That's not the issue. There are specific rules for when you are allowed to have a page on this site, and these two haven't done enough to qualify. Xbsv (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)